Type the number of parts you want and the splitter above works out the grid for you. Ask for 12 and it cuts 3 rows by 4 columns. Ask for 7 and it cuts a single row of 7, because 7 has no other factors. Every part is the same size and downloads as its own file.
Drop an image here
or , or paste with Ctrl+V
JPG, PNG, WebP, GIF, BMP and AVIF, up to 50 MB.
Drag any line to move a cut. Tab to a line and use the arrow keys to nudge it one pixel, or hold shift for ten.
Vertical cuts give side-by-side pieces. Horizontal cuts stack them.
The tool picks the rows and columns that keep the pieces closest to square.
A shared strip on each seam, so the sheets can be trimmed and taped.
Each piece is resized to the size this page targets before it is saved.
Your image never leaves your device. Splitting runs in your browser with the Canvas API.
| 2 pieces | 1 × 2, each 2000 × 3000 px |
|---|---|
| 3 pieces | 1 × 3, each 1333 × 3000 px, last piece 1334 × 3000 px |
| 4 pieces | 2 × 2, each 2000 × 1500 px |
| 5 pieces | 1 × 5, each 800 × 3000 px |
| 6 pieces | 2 × 3, each 1333 × 1500 px, last piece 1334 × 1500 px |
| 8 pieces | 2 × 4, each 1000 × 1500 px |
| 9 pieces | 3 × 3, each 1333 × 1000 px, last piece 1334 × 1000 px |
| 12 pieces | 3 × 4, each 1000 × 1000 px |
Most splitters make you think in rows and columns. This one does not. You say how many pieces you want and it picks the arrangement.
The rule is simple: it finds the factor pair closest to square and uses that. 4 becomes 2 by 2. 6 becomes 2 by 3. 12 becomes 3 by 4. 16 becomes 4 by 4. A prime number has no factor pair, so 7 becomes one row of 7 and 11 becomes one row of 11. If the arrangement it picks is not the one you wanted, every alternative is one click away, and the count stays the same.
Equal means equal to the pixel wherever the maths allows it. A 1080 × 1080 px image into 4 gives four 540 × 540 px parts, identical to the pixel. When the numbers do not divide cleanly, the cuts land on whole pixels and the last part in each row and column absorbs the remainder, which is at most one or two pixels. That is the difference between parts that rejoin exactly and parts that leave a hairline seam.
The ceiling is 20 by 20, so 400 pieces. Realistically anything past about 30 pieces is a job for splitting by tile size rather than by count.
All of it runs in your browser. Your image is never uploaded.
Sometimes the number comes from outside: five people to share a picture between, eight sheets of paper, ten slides to fill. Type the number and let the tool pick the arrangement rather than working out factor pairs yourself. It shows you the grid it chose before anything is exported.
Classroom and workshop exercises often need one picture cut into as many pieces as there are people. Equal parts keeps it fair and the numbered file names keep track of which piece is which. Print them at the same size and they reassemble into the original on a table.
Large images are hard to annotate at full size and easy to annotate in pieces. Cutting one into a fixed number of equal parts gives you consistent chunks to hand out or work through, with names carrying the row and column so a label can be traced back to its position.
A wide graphic split into an exact number of slides fills a deck or a carousel without leftovers. Ask for the slide count you need and take the single-row arrangement, then pad each part to 4:5 if it is going on Instagram so the platform does not crop into it.
Enter the number of parts in the splitter above. The tool factors that number into the arrangement closest to square, shows you the grid in the preview, and cuts equal pieces. Download them individually or as a ZIP. No account, no upload, no watermark on any of the parts.
Give the tool a count and it produces that many separate image files from one source. Each piece is a real file you can download, post or print on its own. Every piece keeps the resolution it had in the source, because nothing is scaled during the split.
The factor pair closest to square. 4 gives 2 by 2, 6 gives 2 by 3, 9 gives 3 by 3, 12 gives 3 by 4 and 16 gives 4 by 4. Numbers with no factor pair, such as 5, 7 and 11, come out as a single row of that many parts.
Wherever the dimensions divide cleanly, yes, to the pixel. When they do not, the cuts stay on whole pixels and the last part in each row or column takes the leftover one or two pixels. Nothing is resampled, so the parts still rejoin with no visible seam.
The grid ceiling is 20 rows by 20 columns, so 400 parts from one image. Very high counts are usually better served by splitting on tile size, where you set the pixel dimensions of each tile and let the count fall out of the source size.
Yes. Export to PNG or lossless WebP and every pixel is copied exactly as it was. Export to JPG and each part is encoded once at quality 92, which is hard to distinguish from the source. No part is ever scaled up or down during the split.